Two posts ago, we promised to discuss the general theory behind triangles whose sides have slopes of — and here we go!!! We also considered, in the previous post, triangles whose sides have slopes of the form . If you loved those two, and you read this one through, you’ll love this one too. Or even “befriend” it as we do.

That’s true.

## Slopes in arithmetic progression

#### Example 1

Find coordinates for the vertices of a triangle whose sides have slopes of .

Let have vertices as shown below:

Since the slopes of sides are , respectively, we have the following __linear__ equations:

which we can recast into a “homogeneous” system:

(1)

(2)

(3)

Notice that there are six unknowns in three equations, so the system is __underdetermined__. Being also __homogeneous__, it has an infinite number of solutions, as our friend from L.A. (a.k.a Linear Algebra, not Los Angeles), just informed us. By __row reduction__, our system is found to have a __rank__ of as well as three __degrees of freedom__ — the latter meaning that the solution can be expressed in terms of three parameters (or “free” variables). In fact, we have:

where are our three “free” variables. Observe that the coefficients of these variables __add up to one__ in the above equations, so in a sense they’re __weighted__.

To sum up, the required coordinates are:

As you may have thought, the formula breaks down when , but this leads to an important special case that deserves a separate treatment.

#### Example 2

In the notation of our first diagram, PROVE that if, and only if, .

This is immediate; just another way of saying that the slope of side is zero. However, if we want to be fancy, we can use equation (3). First assume that . Then (3) reduces to . Conversely, if , then we’re left with

which in turn leaves us with two choices: or . However, is impossible because otherwise it would mean that . Together with the fact that (by the assumption in the converse), the points and will coincide, meaning that we don’t have a triangle. So we choose and this completes the proof.

As a by-product, we also obtain that is equivalent to . We’ll have more to say about this case later.

#### Example 3

Find the -coordinate of the centroid of a triangle whose sides have slopes of .

The -coordinate of the centroid is given by . Using the coordinates we found in Example 1, we have:

#### Example 4

PROVE that if the slopes of the sides of a triangle follow an arithmetic progression, then the triangle contains one __vertical__ median.

Let have vertices and let sides have slopes of , respectively. In Example 3, we saw that the -coordinate of the centroid is precisely . Since the centroid shares an -coordinate with a triangle’s vertex (in this case ), we know — from our previous post — that the median through that vertex is vertical.

#### Example 5

PROVE that if the slopes of the sides of a triangle follow an arithmetic progression , then so do the __x-coordinates__.

Note that the __converse__ is not true.

To prove the above statement, we can use a result from our previous post, but let’s calculate it directly here. Enumerate the -coordinates as follows:

So the -coordinates differ consecutively by .

The fact that the -coordinates follow an arithmetic progression whereas the -coordinates do not (necessarily) follow an arithmetic progression makes the resulting triangle diagram quite weird, which was what we called “ugly-looking” two posts ago.

## Slopes in geometric progression

#### Example 6

Find coordinates for the vertices of a triangle whose sides have slopes of .

Of course, we want and . If there be any other restriction, it will become obvious when we’re done with the computations.

To find the coordinates, suppose we work with whose vertices are as shown below:

As before, it boils down to solving a linear system:

where, after row reduction and back-substitution, the solution is:

In each of the above expressions, the coefficients of the “free variables” __add up to one__, so in a sense they’re __weighted__.

#### Example 7

Find the centroid of the triangle with vertices given in Example 6 above.

The -coordinate of the centroid is :

If , then the -coordinate coincides with . (Note that we __can’t__ have since otherwise one of the slopes will be zero, and we’re working with slopes in geometric progression.)

For the -coordinate of the centroid, we use :

If , the -coordinate of the centroid coincides with .

COOL.

#### Example 8

Let be such that sides have slopes , respectively. PROVE that the slope of the median from vertex is .

The fact that the slope of the median from vertex to side and the slope of side are negatives of each other has an important implication and application (see Example 9 below).

To prove the present statement, let’s refer to an earlier diagram:

We found that

The midpoint of is and so the slope of the median from vertex is:

#### Example 9

Let be such that sides have slopes , respectively. PROVE that if, and only if, .

Suppose that (a similar argument holds for ). By Example 8 above, the slope of the median from vertex is . But then this means that the median from vertex is perpendicular to side . Therefore, and is __isosceles__.

Conversely, suppose that . Then the median from vertex is perpendicular to side , which in turn means that the product of their slopes is . Since their slopes are and , it follows that

So we obtain a characterization of isosceles triangles, using slopes in geometric progression.

#### Example 10

Let be a __right-triangle__ in which sides have slopes , respectively. PROVE that is __necessarily negative__, and that side __cannot be the hypotenuse__.

Since the location of the right-angle was not specified, we have to consider all possibilities. We use the fact that the product of the slopes of two perpendicular lines is , and take the product of two slopes at a time:

From the first equation, , which is always negative because the denominator is always positive whatever (the real number) is. From the third equation, we have , and again is negative since it’s only the cube of a negative (real) number that can be negative.

Now from the second equation, we have . Since the left side of this equation is always positive whereas the right side is always negative, the equation doesn’t have real solution. In turn, this means that side (with slope ) and side (with slope ) do not form a right-angle. Therefore, side cannot be the hypotenuse.

## Numerical examples

We now move from the abstract angle to actual examples.

- Let and . Then the arithmetic sequence is and the corresponding coordinates for the vertices of a triangle with slopes are:
are “free” variables. We obtain an assemblage of triangles by specifying values for , so long as .

- Put and . Then . The resulting triangle has coordinates at :
Notice the presence of a vertical median .

- Put and . Then . We obtain a triangle with coordinates at :
Notice the presence of a vertical median .

- Put and . Then . The resulting triangle has coordinates at :
- Let and . Then the corresponding arithmetic sequence of slopes is ; moreover:
Depending on what we choose for the “free variables”, we obtain different sets of triangles. Let . Then . This results in a triangle with coordinates at :

Notice the presence of a vertical median . Also this is a right triangle.

- An example of a triangle with slopes in geometric progression. Let and ; the corresponding geometric sequence of slopes is . If we put and in our formula, we obtain
Next stop: choose values for the “free variables” , bearing in mind that . Let and . We obtain and the resulting triangle has vertices located at :

Notice that this is a right triangle.

- Let and ; we obtain the geometric sequence of slopes . In turn:
For convenience, let’s choose our “free variables” and . We then obtain and a triangle with coordinates at results:

- Here’s an example in which some of the coordinates are irrational numbers. Let and . Let’s also choose our “free variables” right away: and . We obtain and a triangle with coordinates at results:
There’s something fascinating about this example that is worth mentioning. Observe that the given triangle doesn’t contain . Now the midpoints of sides are

Consequently, the lengths of the medians from are , respectively. How are these related?

COOL.

## Takeaway

If the slopes of the sides of a triangle are (a geometric progression), and the slopes of the sides of another triangle are (an arithmetic progression), then properties that correspond to have analogues in . These properties are mainly lateral properties — isosceles or equilateral.

We encourage you to investigate different cases of slopes in arithmetic progression and slopes in geometric progression. You’ll encounter exciting surprises.

## Tasks

- PROVE that if the slopes of the sides of a triangle form a geometric progression , then the slopes of its three medians
__also__form a geometric progression (with a different common ratio), provided . - PROVE that if the slopes of the sides of a triangle form an arithmetic progression, then the slopes of its three medians
__do not__form an arithmetic progression. - Let () be the slopes of the sides of a . PROVE that the product of the slopes of the three medians is .
- PROVE that if the slopes of the sides of a triangle are , then the triangle
__can never__be a right triangle.

Of course . - PROVE that if the slopes of the sides of a triangle are , where and are
__rational__numbers, then the triangle__can never__be equilateral.

Actually if either or is a rational number, same conclusion. - PROVE that if the slopes of the sides of a triangle are , where and are
__rational__numbers, then the triangle__can never__be equilateral.

It appears that equilateral triangles don’t like rational numbers? - Let be such that sides have slopes , respectively. PROVE that the median from and the median from
__can never__intersect at , except when .

Any triangle whose side slopes form a geometric progression with common ratio is a peach. - PROVE that if the -coordinates of the vertices of a triangle form an arithmetic progression, then the slopes of the sides
__do not__necessarily form an arithmetic progression.

A counter-example will do. - If the slopes of the sides of a triangle form a geometric sequence with a common ratio of , PROVE that both the -coordinates and the -coordinates form arithmetic progressions.

Cool. - Let be such that sides have slopes of , respectively. PROVE that if, and only if .

Pretend that you’re unaware of the Pythagorean theorem and perpendicular slopes. Solve the problem without recourse to these two.

## One thought on “Arithmetic and geometric slopes”

Comments are closed.