For
in which sides
have slopes
, respectively, the equation connecting their side lengths is
(1) ![]()
as we saw a post ago. The equation connecting their median lengths is
(2) ![]()
and is today’s goal.
Compare the relationship between the medians of a right triangle with the medians of a triangle with slopes
.
This is the final, knockout round of our compare-contrast-contest with the right triangle. The contest started on June 28, with the right triangle currently having an edge.
- In a right triangle, the medians are related via
, where
is the length of the median to the hypotenuse (see the exercises). The triangle with slopes
doesn’t satisfy this relation, unless we put
in (2).
Winner: Right triangle; Score is
. - The previous score was
, in favour of the right triangle.
Final verdict: Right triangle wins
on aggregate. Case closed.
We still celebrate the triangle with slopes
, despite been rightly trounced by the right triangle.
Consider
with vertices
,
, and
. Verify that three medians satisfy equation (2).

Note that the slopes of sides
are
, respectively. They form a geometric progression with
. The midpoints of these sides have been marked. Thus, by the distance formula:

YEA.
Consider
with vertices at
,
, and
. Verify that the three medians satisfy equation (2).
Easy-peasy. Observe that the slopes of sides
are
. They form a geometric progression with common ratio
. Let’s draw a diagram:

The median lengths then follow by the distance formula. We have:

There we go. The formula works for both positive and negative common ratios.
In
, the median lengths are related via
. Find (possible) coordinates for the vertices
.
Try solving this problem in a way other than what we present below.
In (2), set
and solve for
:

The workload reduces to finding coordinates for a triangle whose slopes form a geometric progression with common ratio
.
Easy-peasy.
Among the many options we have for the vertices of a triangle with side slopes
, we can take
,
, and
With
, these become
,
, and
. Use these as
. That is, take
,
, and
as the triangle’s vertices. A quick calculation shows that
,
, and
(as in, triple three).

Watch what happens when
in both (1) and (2).
Put
in (1). Obtain
.
Put
in (2). Obtain
.
These are well-known, equivalent conditions for the medians from
and
to be perpendicular.
Is it surprising that it’s our favourite
-value that saved the day?
For
, let
. Evaluate
, and show that they are all sums of two consecutive squares.
Observe that the only integer values of
that produce integer values of
are
.

In addition,
defines a bijection
.
In
, we have
and
. Find the value of
.
You can suspect what
will be. From (1) and (2), set
![]()
Clear fractions, and simplify to obtain the quartic polynomial equation
![]()
The second quadratic factor,
, is really irreducible (its discriminant is
). So the only real roots come from the first one:
![]()
Thus, for
, we have:

Similarly, for
, we have:

The value of
is
, as you may have correctly guessed.
OK, the above approach was definitely an over
ill for something that can be obtained in a simpler way, but it just confirms that our theory conforms to what is more established. See the next example for a better strategy.
In any
, PROVE that the following two statements are equivalent:
- the relations
and
hold simultaneously;
.
Consider
and let’s default to standard notation. Use the fact that the median lengths are related to the side lengths via:
(3) 
from which
. Now, since
, this becomes
. Also,
becomes
. Since
, we have:

In view of
, we see that
can’t be negative (in fact,
: example 10), so discard
, and take
as the only valid solution. Thus,
.
To see that
, suppose that
. Assume that
. We’ll show that
as well. Indeed, from (3):

Similarly, if we started with
, we’ll again arrive at
. This proves
.
Bottom line: the two statements are equivalent as claimed.
Kindly bear with us for switching back and forth between the standard notation
and
. Hopefully this doesn’t cause any confusion.
In any
, if
and
, PROVE that
.
The relationship
![]()
holds in any triangle. Using the fact that
and
, we have:

Although we freely cancelled out the common factor
, it shouldn’t obscure the fact that the relations
and
hold simultaneously only when
.
If
, PROVE that
.
Compare with exercise 5 below.
For the proof, begin with one of the expressions in (3):

Since the left side
is positive, so must the right side be, and we only have to impose this restriction on the nonkonstant
.
, as desired.
Takeaway
In the equation
![]()
the median from vertex
and the median from vertex
are perpendicular only when
. If the focus shifts to the medians from
and
, or the medians from
and
, then other values of
can still ensure perpendicularity.
Tasks
- Find possible coordinates for the vertices of
if its three medians are related via
. - Find possible coordinates for the vertices of
if its three medians are related via
. - PROVE that the medians in a right triangle are related via
, where
is the length of the median to the hypotenuse. - Derive equation (2).
- Let
and
. PROVE that both
and
have the same minimum value, but that their common minimum occurs at different values of
. - Consider the rational function
:
- Verify equation (2) for a triangle with vertices at
,
, and
. - PROVE that if a right triangle has slopes in geometric progression with common ratio
, then both the squares of the median lengths and the squares of the side lengths form arithmetic progressions. - PROVE that the “mapping”
, is not well-defined. What modifications should be made to the domain or range, so that the mapping can be well-defined? - If
and
, PROVE that
is then a sum of two consecutive squares.